21 August 2007

Democrats--No Better Than The Ones They Replace

Dems have done little as a group, their main reason for theiir election was to end the war. How is that working out for you? They made their show and now they can claim they are doing what they were sent to washington to do--it is not their fault that they do not have the votes to override a veto. So they did not know this before pushing the agenda? Of course, they did--they are not that f*cking stupid! It is not their fault, it is those damn Repubs! People wake up! They played you like a cheap flute and you bought it hook line and sinker!

"I believe that the decision to invade Iraq and the post-invasion management of that country were among the largest foreign-policy mistakes in the history of our nation. I voted against them, and I still think they were the right votes," Baird said in a telephone interview from Washington, D.C.

"But we're on the ground now. We have a responsibility to the Iraqi people and a strategic interest in making this work."

Those words were uttered by Congressman Brian Baird. Do you notice there is always a BUT? Slowly but slowly the Dems are lining themselves up with an extended saty in Iraq. Just read news reports. Hillary says it! They all say it, but Kucinich.

You are still being played. The report due in sept has already been decideed what wilkl be said and done. The news will tell you that, there is more shuffling than a deck of cards in Vegas. are you confident of your representatives? If you are then you need a nap! You are being played, sucka!

Wake up! Before it is too late and too many more Americans die!

CHUQ

2 comments:

tumbleweed said...

From what I gather, it has to do with what the term "progress" means

Their definition, and what I consider progress, are 2 different definitions.

I see conditions getting worse, a hell of a lot worse actually Brits are on the verge of defeat in the south, and the north is about to erupt into a battleground, with with the Kurds caught between 2 hostile forces.

Our forces can't even take control of Baghdad from a militia army. There is no progress. IMO.

Plus the government of Iraq is on the verge of collapse.

CHUQ said...

I am sure that the definition for progress when it is given in Congress will not appear to be anything like a Webster's definition.

AS ALWAYS, THANS FOR THE VISIT!

Blog Archive

About Me

My photo
The truth is never as obvious as it seems